Scoping reviews are becoming an increasingly used methodology for conducting evidence syntheses of the literature. This class provides an overview of scoping reviews and the process of conducting one.

Zoom Link for 11/26 Class: https://northwestern.zoom.us/j/97581764759

This class provides an overview of resources to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist as a tool to guide the review process. 

“Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, enable readers to assess for the presence of selective reporting against completed reviews, and, when made publicly available, reduce duplication of efforts and potentially prompt collaboration.” (Shamseer et al., 2015)

A well-done systematic review starts with a protocol. Let us show you how to get your review off to the best possible start.

We also offer a companion class: Conducting a Systematic Review: Part 2 - Tools & Resources, usually in the month following the Part 1 class. If you prefer not to wait for it to be scheduled, you can view the class recording, linked from that page.

Evidence is at the heart of systematic and scoping reviews. This is an interactive two-part class where attendees will learn about the multi-step process of developing a search strategy, applying the search to various sources, and generating documentation for the manuscript. In Part 1, we will cover PRISMA guidelines, search strategy development, and search techniques.

In Part 2, we will cover applying the search strategy to PubMed, search translation to different databases, and documentation [visit the class page to register for the second part].

Important – Prior to enrollment, please complete the prerequisite classes and trainings listed below:

Prerequisites 

• PubMed 
• Conducting a Systematic Review: Part 1 - Planning the Process or Conducting a Scoping Review 
• Conducting a Systematic Review: Part 2 - Tools & Resources [also applicable to scoping reviews] 
• Using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®) - Module 1: Foundations of MeSH in MEDLINE®

Register to receive a link to the recording at the completion of the workshop.

Evidence is at the heart of systematic and scoping reviews. This is an interactive two-part class where attendees will learn about the multi-step process of developing a search strategy, applying the search to various sources, and generating documentation for the manuscript. In Part 2, we will cover applying the search strategy to PubMed, search translation to different databases, and documentation.

Important – Prior to enrollment, please complete the prerequisite classes and trainings listed below:

Prerequisites 

• Conducting Systematic and Scoping Reviews: Search Development and Documentation - Part 1
• PubMed 
• Conducting a Systematic Review: Part 1 - Planning the Process or Conducting a Scoping Review 
• Conducting a Systematic Review: Part 2 - Tools & Resources [also applicable to scoping reviews] 
• Using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®) - Module 1: Foundations of MeSH in MEDLINE®

Register to receive a link to the recording at the completion of the workshop.

An introduction to information resources in evidence-based medicine, designed for those who need to find up-to-date, clinically relevant information quickly. Databases such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and MEDLINE search filters are covered.

Accurate, transparent, and replicable research is the backbone of evidence-based healthcare. This class explores key concepts and tools to help authors improve the quality of their manuscripts and readers evaluate existing research. 

This class provides an overview of resources to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist as a tool to guide the review process. 

“Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, enable readers to assess for the presence of selective reporting against completed reviews, and, when made publicly available, reduce duplication of efforts and potentially prompt collaboration.” (Shamseer et al., 2015)

A well-done systematic review starts with a protocol. Let us show you how to get your review off to the best possible start.